LiveKit pricing can escalate quickly at scale. Here’s how to eliminate session fees, cut STT and TTS costs in half, and scale voice AI without tradeoffs.
Voice AI agents do not just introduce a new interface, they introduce a new cost model. And for most teams, the challenge is not getting a system to work. It is keeping it affordable and reliable once usage grows.
In a typical LiveKit Cloud deployment, two factors quickly become dominant: active session fees and speech service costs. Both are manageable at small scale, but they compound rapidly as you move into production.
Start with session fees. LiveKit Cloud charges $0.01 per minute for each concurrent agent. At low volumes, this is easy to ignore. But as concurrency increases, this cost becomes significant and, more importantly, difficult to control. Real time systems do not scale linearly. Usage spikes, traffic bursts, and peak hour demand all push concurrency higher, often at the exact moments when performance matters most.
LiveKit on Telnyx removes that constraint by eliminating session fees entirely during the beta period. The immediate effect is financial, but the more meaningful impact is architectural. Without a per minute penalty on concurrency, teams can design systems around responsiveness and availability rather than cost containment.
Related articles
Agents can remain active and ready instead of being spun up and down to manage spend. Peak traffic can be absorbed without hesitation. Systems can be designed for real time responsiveness rather than cost optimization. In practice, this leads to faster connection times, fewer dropped interactions, and a more consistent experience for end users.
The second shift happens at the speech layer. LiveKit on Telnyx delivers 50% lower speech-to-text and text-to-speech costs compared to LiveKit Cloud pricing on the same models for the first 90 days.
This reflects a different underlying model: speech inference runs on Telnyx owned GPU infrastructure instead of being routed through and resold by third party APIs.
In a typical multi vendor setup, each layer introduces markup and inefficiency. Requests are routed across systems, costs accumulate at each boundary, and performance can vary depending on external capacity. By consolidating those layers, Telnyx reduces both cost and variability. You are paying for the actual work being done, not for the overhead of stitching multiple services together.
These two changes, removing session fees and lowering speech costs, combine to reshape the economics of scaling voice AI agents.
One of the first things this unlocks is the ability to scale without artificial limits. Many teams quietly constrain their deployments to manage cost. They limit concurrency, shorten conversations, or restrict when agents are available. These compromises are rarely visible in architecture diagrams, but they show up in user experience.
Conversations feel rushed. Availability becomes inconsistent. Performance degrades under load. And over time, those issues compound into lower containment rates and higher operational costs elsewhere in the business.
With a lower and more predictable cost base, those constraints become less necessary. Teams can expand usage more confidently, support more concurrent interactions, and handle peak demand without treating it as a financial risk. Voice AI becomes something you can roll out broadly across the business, not something you keep contained within a narrow set of use cases.
At the same time, lower speech costs change how teams think about model selection. In many deployments, there is a constant tradeoff between quality and cost. Higher quality speech-to-text improves accuracy but increases spend. More natural text-to-speech voices improve the user experience but are harder to justify at scale.
As a result, teams often reserve premium models for specific scenarios and rely on cheaper alternatives elsewhere.
Reducing STT and TTS costs by roughly half makes those tradeoffs far less severe. Teams can standardize on higher quality models, improve first turn understanding, and deliver more natural conversations without seeing costs escalate at the same rate.
That improvement is not just technical. It directly impacts business outcomes. Better recognition reduces repetition. More natural voices improve trust. More accurate conversations reduce escalations to human agents. Over time, these gains compound into a meaningfully better customer experience.
Another, less obvious benefit is flexibility. LiveKit deployments often involve multiple vendors for speech, telephony, and infrastructure. Once those integrations are in place, switching providers can be difficult. Each vendor introduces its own APIs, behaviors, and edge cases, which means even small changes can require engineering effort and careful testing.
LiveKit on Telnyx simplifies that landscape by providing access to multiple speech providers through a unified API. This allows teams to select models per request, optimize for different scenarios, and adapt quickly if pricing or performance changes.
Just as importantly, it reduces dependence on any single provider. You retain the flexibility to evolve your stack without having to re-architect your system.
This consolidation also reduces operational overhead. Instead of managing and troubleshooting multiple integrations, teams can rely on a more tightly integrated platform where speech, telephony, and infrastructure are designed to work together.
Fewer moving parts means fewer points of failure. It means more predictable performance. And it means engineering teams can spend more time improving the core product rather than maintaining the underlying system.
Taken together, these changes lead to a more predictable cost structure. Removing session fees eliminates one of the most volatile components of LiveKit Cloud pricing, while lower speech-to-text and text-to-speech costs reduce the marginal cost of each interaction.
For technical and business stakeholders alike, this makes it easier to forecast spend, plan growth, and align infrastructure decisions with business goals.
The end result is not just a cheaper deployment, but a more scalable one. Costs grow in proportion to usage rather than outpacing it, and teams gain the flexibility to prioritize performance and user experience without being constrained by pricing mechanics.
That shift is what makes it possible to move from a successful prototype to a truly production grade voice AI system.
