The right phone system can make or break how you do business. When it comes to SIP vs PRI, there's a clear cut winner.

The right phone system can make or break how you do business. When it comes to SIP vs PRI, there's a clear winner.
Choosing a new phone system may seem fraught with acronyms and unfamiliar technology. However, the array of acronyms and tech comes down to comparing two key systems: PRI vs SIP.
This comparison can be summed up as classic versus modern. Here's how to determine which is best for your business.
PRI (Primary Rate Interface) trunking and SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) trunking are both systems for connecting calls to your regional telephone network. But while PRI is based on traditional telephone networking technology, SIP trunking is built on internet connections.
This means that PRI relies almost entirely on physical wire connections. Of course, a SIP trunk requires some physical connection points but much of the data transmission in SIP trunking goes through virtual connections. As you'll see later on, this difference has big impacts on the flexibility and scalability of each system.
Now, both PRI and SIP use a PBX (Private Branch Exchange) system to connect the lines in your building to the outside public phone lines. And, with the right adapters and hardware, you can use the same phones for PRI and SIP trunking connections.
So, in the PRI vs SIP trunk comparison, the major differentiator is how call data is moved from one end of the call to the other. This difference presents certain advantages and disadvantages for each system.
The table below provides a side-by-side comparison of the key differences between PRI and SIP trunking to help you evaluate which solution fits your business needs.
| Feature | PRI Trunk | SIP Trunk |
|---|---|---|
| Connection Type | Physical copper wire (T1/E1 circuits) | Virtual internet connection |
| Simultaneous Calls | Limited to 23 channels per trunk | Unlimited (bandwidth dependent) |
| Phone Numbers | Up to 100 per trunk | Unlimited, easily provisioned |
| Scalability | Add physical lines (23 at a time) | Instant, on-demand scaling |
| Setup Time | Weeks to months for installation | Minutes to days |
| Infrastructure | Requires dedicated hardware | Uses existing internet connection |
| Geographic Flexibility | Location-dependent | Work from anywhere |
| Disaster Recovery | Limited failover options | Built-in redundancy and failover |
| Call Quality | Consistent, dedicated bandwidth | HD voice with proper QoS |
| Communication Types | Voice only | Voice, video, messaging, fax |
| Monthly Cost | Higher fixed costs | Lower, pay-per-use pricing |
| Maintenance | Carrier-managed, slower repairs | Self-service or rapid support |
| Future-Proofing | Legacy technology being phased out | Modern standard, actively developed |
A PRI (Primary Rate Interface) trunk is a packaged bundle of wires that carries up to 23 voice channels. One PRI trunk can have up to 100 phone numbers, but can only handle 23 simultaneous calls. A PRI trunk is dedicated to phone calls, and can only transmit voice signals.
PRI is the traditional connection method associated with the PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network). It's a very straightforward connection method that essentially creates a copper wire connection from one end of a phone call to the other, with the PSTN in the middle.
The 23 voice channels in a PRI trunk can be reconfigured and assigned to new phone numbers relatively easily. So PRI offers some flexibility for businesses that operate in large office buildings or need to establish connections for special needs like video conferences.
The benefits of PRI are derived from the infrastructure of a physical, copper wire connection. Let's dig into the key benefits:
Obviously, PRI trunking works. It's not a bad option. But it's also not perfect.
Although copper wires have their benefits, the main limitations of PRI are also related to its dependence on physical connections. Watch out for these limitations, if you're running calls on a PRI trunk:
Ultimately, PRI offers good call quality and security. But it's best for businesses that can work with a relatively fixed phone infrastructure and limited simultaneous calls, as flexibility and scalability aren't exactly the strong points of PRI trunking.
If that doesn't sound like exactly what you need, SIP trunking may be a better solution—after all, it's much easier to reconfigure virtual connections.
SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) trunking is an alternative to PRI that's designed to offer better scalability and flexibility, with minimal (or no) tradeoffs in call quality and security. SIP trunking replaces the physical bundle of wires in a PRI trunk with internet connections.
When a call is connected through a SIP trunk, the phone systems send signals to each other that indicate when to start and end the call, play-back ringing sounds, and stream the audio data between the two phones on the call.
Although the SIP trunk initiates and terminates calls, the audio signals are transmitted using internet protocols—either UDP (User Datagram Protocol) or TCP (Transmission Control Protocol). Most of the time, your calls will connect through your internet service provider's IP network.
SIP has been standardized primarily by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), making it an internationally recognized protocol for real-time communications. This standardization ensures interoperability across different vendors and systems.
Relying on virtual connections rather than physical connections adds a ton of flexibility and scalability. But what exactly does this mean? Here's how connecting calls through SIP trunking can offer a better experience:
Overall, SIP trunking makes it easy and affordable to build your telephony infrastructure and supply all the phone numbers and connections you need.
Even though flexibility and affordability are great, SIP trunking isn't quite perfect. Here are some limitations to be aware of.
Fortunately, there are several SIP trunking technologies—fixed VoIP numbers, private carrier networks, and end-to-end encryption—that enable you to use SIP trunking without really feeling the effects of these potential drawbacks.
Understanding the regulatory environment is crucial when evaluating your long-term telephony strategy. The FCC has been accelerating the transition from legacy copper networks to modern IP-based infrastructure through several orders designed to streamline procedures and help telecom providers deploy upgraded networks faster.
Major carriers like AT&T have announced plans to phase out copper-based TDM services, with significant milestones approaching in the next few years. In the UK, British Telecom has announced plans to retire PSTN infrastructure, with businesses expected to transition to SIP-based connections.
This regulatory shift means that organizations still relying on PRI should begin planning their migration to SIP trunking sooner rather than later to avoid service disruptions and take advantage of modern communication capabilities.
When you add everything up, the end user usually won't be able to tell the difference between calls made on a PRI trunk or those connected with SIP trunking. The differences between the two connection methods are most apparent on the backend, for the individual or business that purchased the connection.
There are two primary factors that will determine if you should use PRI or SIP trunking:
How many simultaneous calls you need to make.
If you need to make more than 23 simultaneous calls, consider SIP trunking. Using a PRI trunk can be expensive and slow to implement, since you'll need to install several PRI trunk cable bundles to get the voice channels you need. Also, if you need to expand your simultaneous call capabilities, it will require another expensive and time consuming installation. Contrarily, the only thing that limits the number of simultaneous calls you can make with SIP trunking is your internet bandwidth. If you have enough bandwidth, you can keep adding calls to the connection without any call quality issues.
How often you need to get new phone numbers or reassign phone numbers to new devices.
You get 100 potential phone numbers with a single PRI trunk and if you need more then you'll have to go through the process of scaling up your PRI infrastructure, which (again) can be time consuming and cost prohibitive. So if you need more than 100 numbers, SIP trunking will likely be a better option as it's much easier to add new phone numbers and reassign phone numbers to new devices with SIP trunking. A good SIP trunking provider will also have a simple, unified interface for provisioning and setting up phone numbers.
The bottom line is this: if your use case requires making many simultaneous calls, supporting a large inventory of phone numbers, or frequently provisioning or reassigning new phone numbers, you should look into SIP Trunking. It's much easier to establish the infrastructure and spin up the connections for high call volumes and many phone numbers.
Conversely, PRI will work well enough for businesses that can operate using a fairly static telephone infrastructure, with modest simultaneous call volume and required phone numbers.
According to industry research from Gartner, "U.S. enterprises of all sizes should migrate to SIP trunking, which will reduce monthly telecommunication expenses by up to 50%."
"The migration to SIP trunking represents not just a shift in technology but a strategic business move towards more efficient, flexible, and cost-effective communication solutions. While the upfront costs and the effort of migration might seem daunting, the long-term benefits and cost savings are significant. Organizations should conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis, ensure SIP interoperability with existing systems, and partner with an experienced provider for seamless implementation."
— Industry guidance from SIP migration specialists
Key considerations for a successful PRI to SIP migration include:
For detailed guidance on SIP trunk setup and configuration, explore the Telnyx SIP Trunking documentation and step-by-step configuration guides.
Does SIP trunking sound like a good fit for your business? Telnyx delivers SIP trunking on a private IP network that gives you all the flexibility, scalability, and affordability of SIP connections, with the same (or better) call quality and reliability you'd get from a PRI connection. Set up SIP Trunking with Telnyx to make and receive secure, highly configurable calls with carrier grade quality and global reach.
For businesses looking to modernize their voice infrastructure, explore Conversational AI solutions that integrate seamlessly with SIP trunking for enhanced customer experiences.
Get in touch with a Telnyx expert to get answers to all your SIP trunking questions.
What do PRI and SIP stand for, and how are they used?
PRI stands for Primary Rate Interface, and SIP stands for the internet-based Session Initiation Protocol that connects a PBX to the public network. SIP uses the Session Initiation Protocol over IP, while PRI relies on dedicated T1 or E1 circuits.
Is SIP cheaper than PRI?
SIP is typically more cost-effective than PRI, especially at higher volumes and across multiple sites. Cost comparisons attribute savings to internet transport, flexible channel scaling, and reduced hardware requirements.
What is a SIP to PRI converter?
A SIP-to-PRI gateway bridges IP-based SIP trunks to legacy PRI interfaces so organizations can modernize without replacing existing PBXs. It translates SIP signaling and media into PRI channels and is often used during staged migrations.
What is PRI in VoIP?
PRI is a digital circuit technology that connects a PBX to the PSTN using T1 or E1, not an IP-based service. In VoIP environments, PRI typically appears at the edge via gateways that translate between IP media and time-division multiplexed channels.
How many channels do PRI and SIP support?
A PRI T1 provides 23 bearer channels in North America and an E1 provides 30 in many other regions. SIP trunks can expose any number of channels for concurrent voice, bounded by bandwidth and licensing rather than fixed circuit sizes.
Which is more scalable, PRI or SIP?
SIP is more scalable because you can add or remove channels in software instead of ordering new physical lines. This elasticity also supports quicker failover, geo-distribution, and burst capacity.
How do I migrate from PRI to SIP without disrupting service?
Plan a phased cutover that includes DID number porting, a parallel run with a SIP-to-PRI gateway, and validation of E911, fax, and failover. Test codec settings, QoS, and security policies before finalizing the switch. For technical implementation details, review the SIP connection configuration guides.
Developer Documentation:
Support Resources:
Industry Resources:
Have SIP trunk or PRI questions after reading? Join r/Telnyx https://www.reddit.com/r/Telnyx/
Related articles